Estabrook v. Mazak Corporation
| Bradley A. Estabrook |
| Mazak Corporation |
| 1:2016cv00087 |
| March 14, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Fort Wayne Office |
| Allen |
| Susan L Collins |
| Rudy Lozano |
| Personal Injury- Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
140
OPINION AND ORDER: GRANTING 122 MOTION for Summary Judgment Renewed by Defendant Mazak Corporation. DENYING 136 MOTION to Strike 131 Statement by Defendant Mazak Corporation. GRANTING 134 MOTION to Supplement 123 Appendix, of Exhibits by Defendant Mazak Corporation and 137 MOTION for Leave to File the Declaration of John Lindenschmidt by Plaintiff Bradley A. Estabrook. DIRECTING the Clerk to enter judgment in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiff. Signed by Judge Holly A Brady on 7/14/2020. (lhc)
|
|
Filing
114
OPINION AND ORDER: The Court hereby CERTIFIES the following question to the Indiana Supreme Court: Can the statute of repose codified in Ind. Code § 34-20-3-1(b) be extended by post sale repair/refurbishment/reconstruction of the product and, if so, what is the appropriate test to be used to determine whether the seller has done sufficient work to trigger the extension? Pursuant to Ind. App. R. 64(B), the Clerk is DIRECTED to provide the Indiana Supreme Court with copies of (1) this Opin ion and Order, (2) the docket in this case, including the names of the parties and their counsel, (3) the Second Amended Complaint ECF No. 35 , Supplement to Second Amended Complaint ECF No. 49 , and Answer ECF No. 65 .Signed by Judge Holly A Brady on 10/22/2019. (Copy mailed as directed in Order. Documents e-mailed to Indiana Supreme Court at clerk@courts.in.gov.)(shk)
|
|
Filing
113
OPINION AND ORDER denying 112 Defendant Mazak Corporations' Motion for Recusal of Judge. Signed by Judge Holly A Brady on 9/11/19. (nal)
|
|
Filing
64
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 37 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Mazak Corporation. Signed by Chief Judge Theresa L Springmann on 5/17/17. (kjp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Estabrook v. Mazak Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Bradley A. Estabrook | |
| Represented By: | Nathaniel O Hubley |
| Represented By: | Alex S Schreiber |
| Represented By: | John C Theisen |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Mazak Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Edward A DeVries |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
