Blankenship v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Margaret Ann Blankenship
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Miscellaneous_party: SSA (Court Use Only)
Case Number: 1:2016cv00222
Filed: June 21, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Office: Fort Wayne Office
County: Lagrange
Presiding Judge: Susan L Collins
Presiding Judge: Jon E DeGuilio
Nature of Suit: Social Security: RSI Tax Suits
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 41 OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 36 Application for Attorney Fees and costs Under the Equal Access to Justice Act filed by Margaret Ann Blankenship. Plaintiff's counsel is awarded a total of $11,809.80 in fees and costs. Signed by Judge William C Lee on 8/6/2018. (lns)
May 24, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 34 OPINION AND ORDER: Court GRANTS 28 Unopposed Motion for an Indicative Ruling on its Rule 60(b) Motion for Relief from Judgment filed by Dft Commissioner of Social Security and GRANTS 33 Unopposed Motion for Relief From Judgment Pursuant to Federa l Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) and for Entry of Judgment Reversing with Remand the Commissioner's Final Decision filed by Dft Commissioner of Social Security. The Court's 21 Opinion and Order and 22 Clerk's Entry of Judgment are VACATED. The Court GRANTS 31 Motion to Dismiss Without Prejudice Plaintiff's Motion for EAJA Fees filed by Dft Commissioner of Social Security. Pla's 30 Motion for Attorney Fees under EAJA is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The decision of the ALJ denying Pla's application for benefits is REMANDED for further proceedings as agreed by the parties herein. Signed by Judge William C Lee on 5/24/2018. (lns)
February 22, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 29 OPINION AND ORDER re 28 Unopposed Motion for an Indicative Ruling on Rule 60(b) Motion re 22 Clerks Judgment. Pursuant to Seventh Circuit Rule 57, this Court indicates that it is inclined to grant the motion and vacate the 6/29/2017 judgment, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.Pro. 60(b)(6), and enter judgment reversing the Commissioner's decision with remand for further administrative proceedings. Signed by Judge William C Lee on 2/22/2018. (cc: USCA) (lns)
June 29, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 21 OPINION AND ORDER: The ALJ's decision is hereby AFFIRMED. ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Judge William C Lee on 6/29/17. (jld)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Blankenship v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Margaret Ann Blankenship
Represented By: Randal S Forbes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Miscellaneous_party: SSA (Court Use Only)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?