R3 Composites Corporation v. G&S Sales Corp.
Plaintiff: |
R3 Composites Corporation |
Defendant: |
G&S Sales Corp. |
Counter_claimant: |
G&S Sales Corp. |
Counter_defendant: |
R3 Composites Corporation |
Case Number: |
1:2016cv00387 |
Filed: |
November 14, 2016 |
Court: |
US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
Office: |
Fort Wayne Office |
County: |
Allen |
Presiding Judge: |
Susan L Collins |
Presiding Judge: |
Jon E DeGuilio |
Nature of Suit: |
Other Contract |
Cause of Action: |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
Jury Demanded By: |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed |
Document Text |
April 8, 2021 |
Filing
113
OPINION AND ORDER re 112 Notice Regarding Issues that Remain Outstanding and are Ripe for Determination by Summary Judgment. The Court concludes that none of the issues in the Notice require a judicial determination as both this Court and the Sev enth Circuit have concluded that genuine issues of fact exist requiring a trial. This case shall proceed to trial in accordance with the Order for Civil Trial, Final Pretrial Conference and Order Controlling the Case, ECF No. 107. Signed by Judge Holly A Brady on 4/8/21. (mlc)
|
February 17, 2021 |
Filing
104
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 81 MOTION for Leave to File Supplemental Complaint, because the proposed supplemental complaint would unduly prejudice G&S, as outlined in Order. DENYING 90 MOTION to Intervene because the motion is untimely and MDG's interests are adequately represented in this matter by G&S. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan L Collins on 2/17/2021. (lhc)
|
October 14, 2020 |
Filing
101
OPINION AND ORDER: Defendant's Motion for Leave to File Sur-Reply Brief Regarding Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Complaint or in the Alternative for Judicial Notice of Facts Relating to MDG Sales Corporation 87 is GR ANTED. The Clerk is DIRECTED to show Defendants proposed surreply (ECF 87-3) as filed. Plaintiff is afforded to and including 10/21/2020, to file a surresponse, not to exceed five pages, if it deems necessary. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan L Collins on 10/14/2020. (shk)
|
February 27, 2019 |
Filing
53
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 49 MOTION for Hearing re 37 MOTION for Summary Judgment Defendant's Request for Oral Argument; GRANTING IN PART and DENYING IN PART 37 MOTION for Summary Judgment. By separate order, the Court will set a telephonic scheduling conference for purposes of scheduling the final pre-trial conference and trial. Signed by Chief Judge Theresa L Springmann on 2/27/19. (ksp)
|
March 20, 2017 |
Filing
15
OPINION AND ORDER: The 14 Motion for Protective Order. The parties may submit a new motion, together with a revised proposed protective order consistent with the requirements of Rule 26(c) and Seventh Circuit case law. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan L Collins on 3/20/17. (jld)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?