Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Co. v. Detamore et al
Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Co. |
Sharon L. Detamore, Samuel Detamore, Jessica Goodwin, Scott Goodwin, Dustin M. Elston and Indiana Farm Bureau Insurance |
1:2017cv00044 |
February 2, 2017 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
Fort Wayne Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Susan L Collins |
James T Moody |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 45 OPINION AND ORDER: GRANTING 40 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Plaintiff Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Co. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter a DECLARATORY JUDGMENT in favor of Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Co. and against all defendants dec laring that no coverage exists under Policy No. F07-80466 for the December, 2014 Accident. Grinnell has no duty to defend or indemnify their insured under that Policy with respect to the claims asserted by the other individual defendants in the lawsuit filed in Huntington Circuit Court, case no. 35C01-1611-CT-659. Signed by Judge William C Lee on 4/9/2018. (lhc) |
Filing 19 OPINION AND ORDER denying without prejudice 17 MOTION for Service by Publication. Plaintiff shall have until July 5, 2017, to try to locate Elston and Detamore and effect service on them and, failing those efforts, to renew the motion for service by publication. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan L Collins on 5/30/2017. (rmc) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.