Paige v. Department of Veterans Affairs et al
| Jena K. Paige |
| Department of Veterans Affairs, United States Air Force and Civil Rights Commission |
| 1:2017cv00174 |
| April 21, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Fort Wayne Office |
| Allen |
| Susan L Collins |
| William C Lee |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
30
OPINION AND ORDER: GRANTING 5 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Defendants Civil Rights Commission, Department of Veterans Affairs, United States Air Force; DENYING AS MOOT 16 MOTION for a Judgment as a Matter of Law as Prescribed in Federal Rules of Civil Procedures Rule 50(2) by Plaintiff Jena K. Paige. Plaintiff Jena K. Paige is hereby ENJOINED AND BARRED FROM FILING any case in this District against any of the three named Defendants in which she attempts to re-litigate the matters presented in this lawsuit. If Plaintiff persists in filing frivolous cases in this Court she will be subject to more serious sanctions, including monetary sanctions and harsher filing restrictions. The Clerk of the Court is instructed to distribute a copy of this opinion and order to all the judges in this District. Signed by Judge William C Lee on 7/27/2017. (Copy mailed to pro se party & all District Court Judges)(lhc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
