Harden v. McDonald et al

Plaintiff: Henry Harden, Jr
Defendant: David J Shulkin
Case Number: 1:2017cv00288
Filed: July 11, 2017
Court: Indiana Northern District Court
Office: Fort Wayne Office
County: Madison
Referring Judge: Paul R Cherry
Presiding Judge: William C Lee
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 13, 2018 32 Opinion or Order of the Court OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 27 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by David J Shulkin as to Pla's unfair labor practices claim and GRANTING Motion as to Pla's constructive discharge claim. The unfair labor practices claim is DISMISSED because the Court is without subject matter jurisdiction to consider it. Clerk to enter judgment in favor of Dft. Signed by Judge William C Lee on 3/13/2018. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(lns)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Harden v. McDonald et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Henry Harden, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David J Shulkin
Represented By: Rachana Nagin Fischer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?