Kaczmarek v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Laura R. Kaczmarek |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| SSA (Court Use Only) |
| 1:2017cv00356 |
| August 18, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Fort Wayne Office |
| Steuben |
| Paul R Cherry |
| William C Lee |
| Disability Insurance |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
30
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 27 MOTION for Attorney Fees pursuant to the Social Security Act 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) (unopposed) filed by Laura R. Kaczmarek. The amount of $21,642.88 less an offset of $12,297.86 for previously awarded EAJA fees, resulting in a net § 406(b) award of $9,345.02 to Counsel. The Commissioner is to RELEASE the remaining withheld past-due benefits in the amount of $6,297.86 to Plaintiff. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan L Collins on 9/15/2020. (mrm)
|
|
Filing
20
OPINION AND ORDER: The Court hereby GRANTS Plaintiff's Brief in Support of Reversing the Decision of the Commissioner of Social Security [DE 17], REVERSES the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security, and REMANDS this matter for f urther proceedings consistent with this Opinion and Order. In light of the errors noted in the first ALJ decision on the instant claims that were not corrected in the second decision, the Court SUGGESTS that this matter be assigned to a different ALJ on remand. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul R Cherry on 8/2/18. (ksp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
