Gossett v. Kroger Limited Partnership I
Plaintiff: Jack Gossett
Defendant: Kroger Limited Partnership I d/b/a Kroger Supermarket and Kroger Limited Partnership I
Case Number: 1:2018cv00239
Filed: August 3, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Office: Fort Wayne Office
County: Allen
Presiding Judge: Susan L Collins
Referring Judge: William C Lee
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 13, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 13, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE, GRANTING #7 Stipulation of Dismissal without prejudice filed by Jack Gossett. The parties have agreed to litigate this matter in the Allen County Superior Court under Cause Number 02D01-1808-CT-000503. The defendant is hereby precluded from raising the dismissal of this case as a defense. Signed by Judge William C Lee on 9/13/2018. (lns)
September 12, 2018 Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss without prejudice pursuant to the stipulation of the parties by Plaintiff Jack Gossett. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Polansky, I)
August 29, 2018 Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons & Complaint served on Kroger c/o Corporation Service Company on 8/14/18, filed by Jack Gossett. (Polansky, I)
August 29, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: Plaintiff is AFFORDED to and including 9/12/2018, to file an amended complaint properly alleging a basis for the Court's jurisdiction. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan L Collins on 8/29/2018. (lhc)
August 8, 2018 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Elizabeth Ann Moore on behalf of Jack Gossett (Moore, Elizabeth)
August 6, 2018 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Kroger Limited Partnership I. NOTE:The attached document is accessible by court personnel only. Summons forms that were electronically submitted to the court for issuance will be returned to counsel via e-mail. (sct)
August 6, 2018 Judge William C Lee and Magistrate Judge Susan L Collins added. (New Case) (sct)
August 3, 2018 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by I Peter Polansky on behalf of Jack Gossett (Polansky, I)
August 3, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against Kroger Limited Partnership I (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0755-3640767.), filed by Jack Gossett. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Polansky, I)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gossett v. Kroger Limited Partnership I
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kroger Limited Partnership I d/b/a Kroger Supermarket
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kroger Limited Partnership I
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jack Gossett
Represented By: I Peter Polansky
Represented By: Elizabeth Ann Moore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?