Jammal Bey v. Parker et al
Abdul Jammal Bey |
Cole Parker and Ron Bortner |
1:2018cv00281 |
September 10, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
Paul R Cherry |
William C Lee |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 25, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 ORDER TAKING UNDER ADVISEMENT #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Pla Abdul Jammal Bey. Pla is directed to file an Amended Complaint within 30 days of the date of this Order that addresses the deficiencies in his Complaint. Pla is granted an opportunity to file an Amended Complaint naming his employer as the Dft in this case and including copies of his Charge of Discrimination and Notice of Right to Sue letter. If Pla fails to submit an Amended Complaint or if his Amended Complaint fails to correct the deficiencies explained in this Order, this case will be dismissed without further notice. Signed by Judge William C Lee on 9/25/2018. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(lns) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Abdul Jammal Bey. (sct) |
Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT with 2 copies of summons forms and 2 copies of USM-285 forms against Ron Bortner, Cole Parker, filed by Abdul Jammal Bey. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 USM 285s)(sct) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.