Hillegass v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Glen M Hillegass
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Undetermined: SSA (Court Use Only)
Case Number: 1:2018cv00416
Filed: December 15, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Philip P Simon
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 5, 2019 Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Sharon Jefferson - AUSA on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Jefferson - AUSA, Sharon)
January 7, 2019 Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by USMS obo Glen M Hillegass. Assistant US Attorney served on 12/31/2018, answer due 3/1/2019. (sct)
January 7, 2019 Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by USMS obo Glen M Hillegass. US Attorney General served on 12/28/2018. (sct)
January 7, 2019 Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by USMS obo Glen M Hillegass. Commissioner of Social Security served on 12/28/2018. (sct)
December 17, 2018 Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. NOTE: The attached document is accessible by court personnel only. (cc; USMS) (sct)
December 17, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER GRANTING the plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF #2 ). WAIVES payment of the filing fee. DIRECTS, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(d), the United States Marshals Service to effect service of process on the defendant. Signed by Judge Philip P Simon on 12/17/2018. (cc: USMS) (sct)
December 17, 2018 Judge Philip P Simon added. (New Case) (IFP Motion Pending) (sct)
December 15, 2018 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Jason S Rodman on behalf of Glen M. Hillegass (Rodman, Jason)
December 15, 2018 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Randal S Forbes on behalf of Glen M. Hillegass (Forbes, Randal)
December 15, 2018 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis accompanied by 3 copies of summons forms and 3 copies of USM-285 forms by Plaintiff Glen M. Hillegass. (Forbes, Randal)
December 15, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT to Review Decision of Commissioner of Social Security Administration against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Glen M. Hillegass. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A Notice of Appeals Council Action, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 Proposed Summons)(Forbes, Randal)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hillegass v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Sharon Jefferson - AUSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Undetermined: SSA (Court Use Only)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Glen M Hillegass
Represented By: Jason S Rodman
Represented By: Randal S Forbes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?