In Re Disciplinary Action Larry W Rogers
In Re: Larry W Rogers
Case Number: 1:2018mc00042
Filed: November 5, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Theresa L Springmann
Nature of Suit: Miscellaneous Case
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 13, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 13, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re #1 Order from Indiana Supreme Court Imposing Attorney Discipline in attorney disciplinary matter regarding attorney Larry W Rogers. Pursuant to N.D. Ind. L.R. 83-6.8(b), the Court gives the Respondent 30 days after service of this Order within which to show cause why the imposition of reciprocal discipline by this Court would be unwarranted. Signed by Chief Judge Theresa L Springmann on 11/13/2018. (cc 2801 Bertholet Blvd Ste 301, Valparaiso, IN 46383)(mtr)
November 5, 2018 Filing 1 PER CURIAM OPINION dated 11/02/2018 from Indiana Supreme Court imposing the following discipline regarding Larry W Rogers: The Court suspends Respondent for 90 days, effective December 14, 2018. All Justices Concur. (mtr)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: In Re Disciplinary Action Larry W Rogers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
In re: Larry W Rogers
Represented By: Larry W Rogers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?