Eib et al v. FXKOK02 Inc et al
| ANGELA EIB and BRAYDEN COX |
| DAVID HIATT, TIMOTHY JOLFIFF, FXKOK02 INC., FXKOK02 Inc and Timothy Joliff |
| 1:2019cv00270 |
| June 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Susan L Collins |
| Damon R Leichty |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Damon R Leichty for all further proceedings. Judge Holly A Brady no longer assigned to case. Signed by Chief Judge Theresa L Springmann on 8/14/19. (ksc)
|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to FXKOK02 Inc, David Hiatt, Timothy Joliff. NOTE:The attached document is accessible by court personnel only. Summons forms that were electronically submitted to the court for issuance will be returned to counsel via e-mail. (sct) |
| Judge Holly A Brady and Magistrate Judge Susan L Collins added. (New Case) (sct) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Christopher S Wolcott on behalf of BRAYDEN COX, ANGELA EIB (Wolcott, Christopher) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against FXKOK02 INC., DAVID HIATT, TIMOTHY JOLFIFF( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0755-3926882.), filed by ANGELA EIB, BRAYDEN COX. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Wolcott, Christopher) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
