Manus v. Hill et al
| Steven Bernard Manus and Steven Bernard-Manus |
| Andrea R Trevino, Haley Hunter, Curtis Hill, DCH and Karen Richards |
| 1:2019cv00350 |
| August 13, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Susan L Collins |
| William C Lee |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed as to Steven Manus. (rmf) |
| Filing 4 CLERK'S ENTRY OF JUDGMENT. (Copy mailed to pro se party certified mail# 7018 1830 0001 3192 2262) (rmf) |
Filing 3
ORDER DISMISSING CASE FOR LACK OF SUBJECT-MATTER JURISDICTION. The Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by petitioner Steven Bernard Manus ECF #2 is DENIED and this case is DISMISSED for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Signed by Judge William C Lee on 9/5/2019. (Copy mailed to pro se party certified mail# 7018 1830 0001 3192 2262) (rmf)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Steven Bernard Manus. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(mrm) |
| Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT with 0 copies of summons forms and 0 copies of USM-285 forms against Danyel C Hairston, Curtis Hill, Haley Hunter, Karen Richards, Andrea R Trevino, filed by Steven Bernard Manus. (no filing fee received)(mrm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
