Fetz v. Nevels
| October Fetz |
| Reggie Nevels |
| 1:2019cv00417 |
| September 30, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Susan L Collins |
| William C Lee |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 (Partial) Initial Partial Filing fee received: $3.83, receipt number INN1010797. (lhc) |
Filing 5
ORDER granting #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Court ORDERS the plaintiff, October Fetz, IDOC # 961835, Grant County Jail #6363, to immediately pay (and the facility having custody to automatically remit) $40.90 to the clerk in payment of the initial partial filing fee, ORDERS the plaintiff to pay (and the facility having custody to automatically remit) to the clerk 20% of the money received for each calendar month during which $10.00 or more is received until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full, DIRECTS the clerk to create a ledger for receipt of these funds and DIRECTS the clerk to send a copy of this order to each facility where the plaintiff is housed until the filing fee has been paid in full. Signed by Judge William C Lee on 11/18/19. (Copy mailed as directed in Order). (nal)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Prisoner Trust Account Ledger attached pgs 1-9)by Plaintiff October Fetz. (Attachments: #1 Trust account pgs 28-50, #2 Envelope, #3 Envelope)(shk) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER denying without prejudice #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Court DIRECTS the clerk to place this cause number on a blank Prisoner Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis AO240 (Rev.7/10)(INND Rev. 8/16) and send it to October Fetz, GRANTS October Fetz until 11/7/19 to return the form with her trust fund ledgers for the past six months and CAUTIONS her that if she does not respond by the deadline, this case will be dismissed without further notice, which will not relieve her of the obligation to pay the filing fee in installments over time. Signed by Judge William C Lee on 10/8/19. (Copy mailed as directed in Order). (nal)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Prisoner Trust Account Ledger attached) by Plaintiff October Fetz. (Attachments: #1 Letter, #2 Transaction History)(bas) |
| Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT with 1 copy of summons forms and 1 copy of USM-285 forms against Reggie Nevels, filed by October Fetz. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Blank USM-285 Form, #3 Envelope) (Copy of complaint mailed to October Fetz) (bas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Fetz v. Nevels | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: October Fetz | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Reggie Nevels | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
