Rooney v. Commissioner of Social Security
MISTY D. ROONEY and Misty D Rooney |
ANDREW M. SAUL and Commissioner of Social Security |
SSA (Court Use Only) |
1:2019cv00542 |
December 24, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
Theresa L Springmann |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER: The Court GRANTS the Plaintiffs First Motion for Transfer of Case toProper Venue (Division) #4 and the clerk is DIRECTED to close this case and open a new case with these filings in the South Bend Division. Signed by Chief Judge Theresa L Springmann on 1/2/2020. (shk) |
**NEW CASE ** MOTION PENDING** Chief Judge Theresa L Springmann added. (nae) |
Filing 4 First MOTION For Transfer to Proper Court Division by Plaintiff MISTY D. ROONEY. (Richter, Matthew) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Joseph R Wambach on behalf of MISTY D. ROONEY (Wambach, Joseph) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew F Richter on behalf of MISTY D. ROONEY (Richter, Matthew) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ANDREW M. SAUL( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0755-4101576.), filed by MISTY D. ROONEY. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons U.S. Attorney General, #3 Proposed Summons U.S. Attorney N.D. IND, #4 Proposed Summons Regional Counsel SSA OGC)(Richter, Matthew) Modified on 12/30/2019 (nae). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.