Dudley v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Randall L Dudley
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Not Classified By Court: SSA (Court Use Only)
Case Number: 1:2020cv00087
Filed: February 22, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Joseph S Van Bokkelen
Referring Judge: Susan L Collins
Nature of Suit: Social Security: RSI Tax Suits
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 15, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER: Pursuant to General Order 2018-14A, 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B), Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), and Northern District of Indiana Local Rule 72-1(b), the Court REFERS this case to the Honorable Susan L. Collins, United States Magistrate Judge, for a Report and Recommendation. The Court's review of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation will be governed by 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(C). The Court also REFERS any non-dispositive motions for disposition by the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A). Signed by Judge Joseph S Van Bokkelen on 4/15/20. (nal)
April 15, 2020 Case reassigned pursuant to General Order 2019-19. Judge Joseph S Van Bokkelen added. Magistrate Judge Susan L Collins no longer assigned to case. (lns)
March 26, 2020 Filing 6 MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONSENT FORMS IN A SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL CASE sent to all parties. Magistrate Consent forms due by 4/9/2020. (mr)
March 25, 2020 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Kathleen T Trzyna - AUSA on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Trzyna - AUSA, Kathleen)
February 24, 2020 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. NOTE: The attached document is accessible by court personnel only. (kjp)
February 24, 2020 Magistrate Judge Susan L Collins added. NEW CASE (kjp)
February 22, 2020 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Jason S Rodman on behalf of Randall L Dudley (Rodman, Jason)
February 22, 2020 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Randal S Forbes on behalf of Randall L Dudley (Forbes, Randal)
February 22, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT to Review Decision of Commissioner of Social Security Administration against Commissioner of Social Security( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0755-4153658.), filed by Randall L Dudley. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A Notice of Decision-Unfavorable, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons)(Forbes, Randal)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dudley v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Randall L Dudley
Represented By: Randal S Forbes
Represented By: Jason S Rodman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Not classified by court: SSA (Court Use Only)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Kathleen T Trzyna - AUSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?