Thayer v. Lincoln Financial Group
| Krystal Thayer |
| Lincoln Financial Group |
| Anthony Stites |
| 1:2020cv00107 |
| March 4, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Holly A Brady |
| Susan L Collins |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
SCHEDULING ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OF PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL CONFERENCE:The Court sets the following deadlines pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b): The parties will exchange the information required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1) by 5/11/2020.The last date for the completion of all fact and expert discovery is 2/11/2021. The serving of reports from retained experts under Rule 26(a)(2) are due from plaintiff by 10/12/2020; and from defendant(s) by 11/11/2020.The last date for the Plaintiff to amend the pleadings without leave of court is 6/11/2020 and for Defendant is 7/13/2020.The deadline to file any dispositive motions is 3/15/2021 with any response due 28 days thereafter and any reply due 14 days after the filing of a response, consistent with Local Rule 56-1(b) and (c). The parties are encouraged to engage in direct negotiations and/or alternate dispute resolution. To that end, the parties have agreed upon Anthony Stites as mediator. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan L Collins on 4/14/2020. (bas)
|
|
Filing 12
TELEPHONIC RULE 16 PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL CONFERENCE held on 4/13/2020 before Magistrate Judge Susan L Collins. Pla appeared by atty Ilene Smith. Dft appeared by atty Melissa Taft. The #9 Report of the Parties Planning Meeting is approved in all respects (except establishment of a trial date). Anthony Stites appointed as Mediator. Atty Taft to notify Mediator by letter, copy to atty Smith. Magistrate Consent forms due by 5/4/2020. (FTR 1st floor.) (mr)
|
|
Filing 11
NOTICE of Appearance by Ilene M Smith on behalf of Krystal Thayer (Smith, Ilene)
|
|
Filing 10
Defendant's ANSWER to Complaint and Affirmative Defenses by Lincoln Financial Group.(Padgett, Michael)
|
|
Filing 9
REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Padgett, Michael)
|
|
Set/Reset Deadlines: per #8 Agreed Notice to extend time to file answer by Lincoln Financial Group; answer due by 4/8/2020. (mrm)
|
|
Filing 8
AGREED NOTICE to extend time to file answer filed by Lincoln Financial Group ; answer due by April 8, 2020. (Padgett, Michael)
|
|
Filing 7
MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONSENT FORMS sent to all parties. (mr)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE of Hearing: Telephonic Rule 16 Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 4/13/2020 at 9:30 AM in US District Court - Fort Wayne before Magistrate Judge Susan L Collins. Court to initiate call. (mr)
|
|
**NEW CASE** Judge Holly A Brady and Magistrate Judge Susan L Collins added. (shk)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE of Appearance by Melissa K Taft on behalf of Lincoln Financial Group (Taft, Melissa)
|
|
Filing 3
Corporate Disclosure Statement by Lincoln Financial Group. (Padgett, Michael)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE of Appearance by Michael W Padgett on behalf of Lincoln Financial Group (Padgett, Michael)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0755-4164589.) from Allen Superior Court, Cause No. 02D03-2001-CT-000064, filed by Lincoln Financial Group. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - State Court Record)(Padgett, Michael)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
