Ritchie v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Jimmy Darrell Ritchie and Jimmy D Ritchie |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| SSA (Court Use Only) |
| 1:2020cv00314 |
| September 2, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| John E Martin |
| Social Security: RSI Tax Suits |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER DENYING #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Jimmy D Ritchie; GRANTING until 11/16/2020, to pay the $400.00 filing fee; and CAUTIONING the plaintiff if there is no response by the deadline, this case will be dismissed without further notice. Signed by Chief Judge Jon E DeGuilio on 10/19/2020. (lhc)
|
| Magistrate Judge John E Martin added. NEW CASE, MOTION PENDING. (nal) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Randal S Forbes on behalf of Jimmy Darrell Ritchie (Forbes, Randal) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Jason S Rodman on behalf of Jimmy Darrell Ritchie (Rodman, Jason) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Jimmy Darrell Ritchie. (Rodman, Jason) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security Administration filed by Jimmy Darrell Ritchie. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A Notice of Decision-Unfavorable, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 Proposed Summons). (Rodman, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
