Boutte' v. Department of Corrections et al
| Lance Scott Boutte' |
| Aramark, Miami Correctional Facility, Judges, Public Defenders, Allen County Jail, Court System, Department of Corrections, Probations, The GEO Group, Inc, Prosecutor and Corizon |
| 1:2020cv00328 |
| September 16, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Holly A Brady |
| Susan L Collins |
| William C Lee |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER: Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 455, the undersigned recuses herself from this case. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 137 and Local Rule 40-1(f)(2)(A), the Clerk of this Court is hereby directed to reassign this matter to Judge William C. Lee for all further proceedings. Signed by Judge Holly A Brady on 10/7/2020. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (lhc)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Prisoner Trust Account Ledger attached) by Plaintiff Lance Scott Boutte'. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(bas) |
| Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT against Allen County Jail, Aramark, Corizon, Court System, Department of Corrections, Judges, Miami Correctional Facility, Probations, Prosecutor, Public Defenders, The GEO Group, Inc, filed by Lance Scott Boutte'. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(bas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
