Robertson v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Melissa Robertson
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Not Classified By Court: SSA (Court Use Only)
Case Number: 1:2020cv00415
Filed: November 17, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Jon E DeGuilio
Referring Judge: Michael G Gotsch
Nature of Suit: Social Security: RSI Tax Suits
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. NOTE: The attached document is accessible by court personnel only. (cc: USMS)(mrm)
December 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER GRANTING #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The payment of the filing fee is WAIVED. The US Marshals Service is DIRECTED to effect service of process on the defendant. Signed by Chief Judge Jon E DeGuilio on 12/22/2020. (cc: USMS)(mrm)
November 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER. The Clerk is DIRECTED to reassign this case to the undersigned as the presiding judge, with Magistrate Judge Michael G. Gotsch, Sr. remaining as the assigned magistrate judge. Signed by Chief Judge Jon E DeGuilio on 11/20/20. (mlc)
November 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr added. (NEW CASE, MOTION PENDING) (rmc)
November 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Jason S Rodman on behalf of Melissa Robertson (Rodman, Jason)
November 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Randal S Forbes on behalf of Melissa Robertson (Forbes, Randal)
November 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Melissa Robertson. (Forbes, Randal)
November 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR MANDAMUS TO REQUIRE THE COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION TO HOLD A HEARING (PRESIDED BY A CONSTITUTIONALLY APPOINTED ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE) IN RELATION TO THE DENIAL PLAINTIFFS DISABILITY INSURANCE BENEFITS APPLICATION against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Melissa Robertson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A Notice of Decision-Unfavorable, #2 Exhibit B Notice of Appeals Council Action, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Proposed Summons, #5 Proposed Summons)(Forbes, Randal)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Robertson v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Melissa Robertson
Represented By: Jason S Rodman
Represented By: Randal S Forbes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Not classified by court: SSA (Court Use Only)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?