Chaudhry v. EZ Screen Solutions, LLC
KEMBERELY CHAUDHRY |
EZ SCREEN SOLUTIONS LLC and EZ Screen Solutions, LLC |
1:2021cv00160 |
April 28, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
Holly A Brady |
Susan L Collins |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Kemberely Chaudhry. EZ Screen Solutions, LLC waiver sent on 5/7/2021, answer due 7/6/2021. (Smith, Larry) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to EZ Screen Solutions, LLC. NOTE:The attached document is accessible by court personnel only. Summons forms that were electronically submitted to the court for issuance will be returned to counsel via e-mail. (bas) |
Judge Holly A Brady and Magistrate Judge Susan L Collins added. (NEW CASE) (bas) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by David M Marco on behalf of Kemberely Chaudhry (Marco, David) Modified on 4/29/2021 (bas). |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Larry P Smith on behalf of Kemberely Chaudhry (Smith, Larry) Modified on 4/29/2021 (bas). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against EZ Screen Solutions, LLC( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0755-4557393.), filed by Kemberely Chaudhry. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Smith, Larry) Modified on 4/29/2021 (bas). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.