Walker v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Sean C Walker
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Not Classified By Court: SSA (Court Use Only)
Case Number: 1:2022cv00005
Filed: January 7, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Susan L Collins
Referring Judge: Philip P Simon
Nature of Suit: Social Security: RSI Tax Suits
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 28, 2022 Filing 10 MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONSENT FORMS IN A SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL CASE sent to all parties. Magistrate Consent forms due by 2/11/2022. (mr)
January 27, 2022 Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Brian Irvin on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Irvin, Brian)
January 26, 2022 Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by USM obo Sean C Walker. Commissioner of Social Security and U.S. Attorney General served on 1/24/2022, U.S. Attorney Served 1/26/2022, answer due 3/28/2022. (mrm)
January 11, 2022 Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. NOTE: The attached document is accessible by court personnel only. (cc: USMS) (mlc)
January 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER GRANTING #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The filing fee is WAIVED. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(d), the United States Marshals Service is directed to effect service of process on the defendant. Signed by Judge Philip P Simon on 1/11/22. (cc USMS) (mlc)
January 10, 2022 **NEW CASE** **MOTION PENDING** Judge Philip P Simon and Magistrate Judge Susan L Collins added. (jdb)
January 7, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Ann E Young on behalf of Sean C Walker (Young, Ann)
January 7, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Jason S Rodman on behalf of Sean C Walker (Rodman, Jason)
January 7, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Randal S Forbes on behalf of Sean C Walker (Forbes, Randal)
January 7, 2022 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Sean C Walker. (Forbes, Randal)
January 7, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT to Review Decision of Commissioner of Social Security Administration against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Sean C Walker. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A Notice of Decision-Unfavorable, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 Proposed Summons)(Forbes, Randal)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Walker v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sean C Walker
Represented By: Ann E Young
Represented By: Jason S Rodman
Represented By: Randal S Forbes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Brian Irvin AUSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Not classified by court: SSA (Court Use Only)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?