Grady v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Cathy Rae Grady
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Not Classified By Court: SSA (Court Use Only)
Case Number: 1:2022cv00007
Filed: January 7, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Susan L Collins
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT OF CASE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE: The parties having consented pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c), this case is referred to Magistrate Judge Susan L Collins for all purposes and is reassigned pursuant to General Order 2018-2. (lhc)
January 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONSENT FORMS IN A SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL CASE sent to all parties. Magistrate Consent forms due by 2/11/2022. (mr)
January 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Brian Irvin on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Irvin, Brian)
January 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by USMS obo Cathy Rae Grady. Commissioner of Social Security and US Attorney General served on 1/24/2022, US Attorney served on 1/26/2022, answer due 3/28/2022. (lhc)
January 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. NOTE: The attached document is accessible by court personnel only. (cc: USMS) (nhc)
January 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER: The court GRANTS the Plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis #2 ; WAIVES payment of the filing fee; and DIRECTS, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(d), the United States Marshals Service to effect service of process on the Defendant. Signed by Judge Theresa L Springmann on 1/11/2022. (cc: USMS) (nhc)
January 10, 2022 Opinion or Order **NEW CASE** **MOTION PENDING** Judge Theresa L Springmann and Magistrate Judge Susan L Collins added. (jdb)
January 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Cathy Rae Grady. (Olinsky, Howard)
January 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Cathy Rae Grady. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 Proposed Summons, #5 USM-285 Form, #6 USM-285 Form, #7 USM-285 Form)(Olinsky, Howard)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Grady v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cathy Rae Grady
Represented By: Howard D Olinsky
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Brian Irvin AUSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Not classified by court: SSA (Court Use Only)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?