Synergid Inc v. Sather
| Synergid Inc and Synergid Inc doing business as Paul Davis of Northeast Indiana |
| Andy Sather |
| 1:2022cv00150 |
| April 29, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Holly A Brady |
| Susan L Collins |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 Petition for Removal |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER for Magistrate Judge Susan Collins: Based on the filing of the #6 Joint Status Report advising of a tentative settlement, the telephonic Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 5/26/2022 at 11:00 am is VACATED. Dismissal Papers to be filed by 6/30/2022.(mr)
|
| Filing 6 STATUS REPORT JOINT by Andy Sather. (Guin, Rachel) |
| Filing 5 MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONSENT FORMS sent to all parties. (mr) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Hearing: Telephonic Rule 16 Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 5/26/2022 at 11:00 AM in US District Court - Fort Wayne before Magistrate Judge Susan L Collins. Court to initiate call.(mr) |
| Judge Holly A Brady and Magistrate Judge Susan L Collins added. NEW CASE. (nal) |
| Filing 2 COUNTERCLAIM against Synergid Inc, filed by Andy Sather.(Guin, Rachel) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AINNDC-4905062.), filed by Andy Sather. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 1 for Petition for Removal)(Guin, Rachel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
