D.C. v. City of Kendallville Indiana et al
| D. C. |
| CITY OF KENDALLVILLE, INDIANA, OFFICER MATT GILLISON, OFFICER ROBERT KLINE, SERGEANT NATE STAHL, Kendallville City of Indiana, Matt Gillison, Robert Kline and Nate Stahl |
| 1:2022cv00246 |
| July 26, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Holly A Brady |
| Susan L Collins |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Nate Stahl. Nate Stahl waiver sent on 9/13/2022, answer due 11/14/2022. (Emerson, James) |
| Filing 16 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Robert Kline. Robert Kline waiver sent on 9/13/2022, answer due 11/14/2022. (Emerson, James) |
| Filing 15 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Matt Gillison. Matt Gillison waiver sent on 9/13/2022, answer due 11/14/2022. (Emerson, James) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by James Alex Emerson on behalf of Matt Gillison, Robert Kline, Nate Stahl (Emerson, James) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew L Hinkle on behalf of Matt Gillison, Robert Kline, Nate Stahl (Hinkle, Matthew) |
Filing 12
ORDER for Magistrate Judge Susan Collins: #11 Defendant City of Kendallville's Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint is granted. Defendant City of Kendallville is granted to and including 10/11/2022 to file an Answer to Plaintiff's #1 Complaint. Text entry order.(mr)
|
| Filing 11 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Defendant Kendallville City of Indiana. (Emerson, James) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by James Alex Emerson on behalf of Kendallville City of Indiana (Emerson, James) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew L Hinkle on behalf of Kendallville City of Indiana (Hinkle, Matthew) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by D. C.. Nate Stahl served on 8/1/2022, answer due 8/22/2022. (Rose, Gavin) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by D. C.. Robert Kline served on 8/1/2022, answer due 8/22/2022. (Rose, Gavin) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by D. C.. Matt Gillison served on 8/1/2022, answer due 8/22/2022. (Rose, Gavin) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by D. C.. Kendallville City of Indiana served on 8/1/2022, answer due 8/22/2022. (Rose, Gavin) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Nate Stahl. NOTE:The attached document is accessible by court personnel only. Summons forms that were electronically submitted to the court for issuance will be returned to counsel via e-mail. (Attachment: #1 Summons with correct date - this document emailed to atty). (nal) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Kendallville City of Indiana, Matt Gillison and Robert Kline. NOTE:The attached document is accessible by court personnel only. Summons forms that were electronically submitted to the court for issuance will be returned to counsel via e-mail. (nal) |
| Judge Holly A Brady and Magistrate Judge Susan L Collins added. NEW CASE. (nal) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Gavin M Rose on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Rose, Gavin) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against Kendallville City of Indiana, Matt Gillison, Robert Kline and Nate Stahl. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AINNDC-4978005) filed by D. C. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Rose, Gavin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
