Hunter v. US Department of Labor
David Hunter |
US Department of Labor |
1:2022cv00398 |
November 8, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
Holly A Brady |
Susan L Collins |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 ORDER for Magistrate Judge Susan Collins: #10 Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Vacate the Scheduled Preliminary Pretrial Conference and Order to File a Report of Parties' Planning is granted. The telephonic Rule 16 Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 1/4/2023 at 10:30 am is VACATED and RESET for 1/30/2023 at 11:00 am in US District Court - Fort Wayne before Magistrate Judge Susan L Collins. Court to initiate call. Parties are to file a proposed discovery plan by 1/26/2023. Text entry order. (copy mailed to pro se Plaintiff)(mr) |
Filing 10 MOTION to Vacate DEFENDANTS UNOPPOSED MOTION TO VACATE THE SCHEDULED PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL CONFERENCE AND ORDER TO FILE A REPORT OF PARTIES PLANNING by Defendant US Department of Labor. (Jefferson - AUSA, Sharon) |
Filing 9 MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONSENT FORMS sent to all parties. (copy mailed to pro se Plaintiff) (mr) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Hearing: Telephonic Rule 16 Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 1/4/2023 at 10:30 AM in US District Court - Fort Wayne before Magistrate Judge Susan L Collins. Court to initiate call. (copy mailed to pro se Plaintiff) (mr) |
Filing 7 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed, filed by David Hunter. (ash) |
Filing 6 ORDER for Magistrate Judge Susan Collins: #5 Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Responsive Pleading is granted. Defendant granted to and including 1/24/2023 to file a response to Plaintiff's #1 Complaint. Text entry order. (copy mailed to pro se Plaintiff)(mr) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer DEFENDANT'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING by Defendant US Department of Labor. (Jefferson - AUSA, Sharon) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Sharon Jefferson - AUSA on behalf of US Department of Labor (Jefferson - AUSA, Sharon) |
Filing 3 PROOF OF SERVICE, filed by David Hunter. (ash) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to US Department of Labor. NOTE:The attached document is accessible by court personnel only. Summons forms that were electronically submitted to the court for issuance will be returned to counsel via e-mail. (ash) |
Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT against US Department of Labor (Filing fee $ 402.00.) Receipt #INN1014470, filed by David Hunter. (ash) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Hunter v. US Department of Labor | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: David Hunter | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: US Department of Labor | |
Represented By: | Sharon Jefferson - AUSA |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.