Nesbitt v. Ultra Electronics Defense, Inc.
Plaintiff: Shaquana Nesbitt
Defendant: Ultra Electronics Defense, Inc.
Not Classified By Court: Pete Schroeder
Case Number: 1:2023cv00199
Filed: May 17, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Holly A Brady
Referring Judge: Susan L Collins
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 21, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 15 SCHEDULING ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OF PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: The Court sets the following deadlines pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b): The parties will exchange the information required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1) by 07/17/2023. The last date for the completion of all fact and expert discovery is 12/18/2023. The serving of reports from retained experts under Rule 26(a)(2) are due from Plaintiff by 09/18/2023; and from Defendant by 10/18/2023. Supplementation under Rule 26(e) due every six weeks until trial. The last date to seek leave of Court to amend the pleadings as to Plaintiff is 08/17/2023; as to Defendant is 09/18/2023. The deadline to file any dispositive motions is 01/18/2024, with any response due 28 days thereafter and any reply due 14 days after the filing of a response, consistent with Local Rule 56-1(b) and (c). the parties have agreed upon Pete Schroeder as mediator. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan L Collins on 06/21/2023. (sej)
June 21, 2023 Filing 14 TELEPHONIC RULE 16 PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL CONFERENCE held on 6/21/2023 before Magistrate Judge Susan L Collins. Pla appeared by atty Ilene Smith. Dft appeared by atty Craig Borowski. The #13 Report of the Parties Planning Meeting is approved in all respects (except establishment of a trial date). Pete Schroeder appointed as Mediator. Atty Borowski to notify Mediator by letter, copy to atty Smith. Magistrate Consent forms due by 7/12/2023. (FTR 1st floor.) (mr)
June 15, 2023 Filing 13 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Borowski, Craig)
June 15, 2023 Filing 12 ANSWER to Complaint by Ultra Electronics Defense, Inc..(Borowski, Craig)
June 14, 2023 Filing 11 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Ultra Electronics Defense, Inc.. (Borowski, Craig)
June 14, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER for Magistrate Judge Susan Collins: Dft is directed to file an amended disclosure statement that FULLY complies with General Order 2023-06 on or before 6/21/2023. The amended disclosure statement filed in ECF 9 is still deficient. Text entry order.(mr)
June 13, 2023 Filing 9 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Ultra Electronics Defense, Inc.. (Borowski, Craig)
June 6, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER for Magistrate Judge Susan Collins: Defendant is directed to file an amended disclosure statement that fully complies with FRCP 7.1 and General Order 2023-06. The disclosure statement filed in #7 is noncompliant. Text entry order.(mr)
June 2, 2023 Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Ultra Electronics Defense, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Ultra Electronics, Inc. for Ultra Electronics Defense, Inc... (Borowski, Craig)
May 26, 2023 Filing 6 MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONSENT FORMS sent to all parties. (mr)
May 26, 2023 Filing 5 NOTICE of Hearing: Telephonic Rule 16 Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 6/21/2023 at 11:00 AM in US District Court - Fort Wayne before Magistrate Judge Susan L Collins. Court to initiate call.(mr)
May 25, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER for Magistrate Judge Susan Collins: Defendant is directed to file a corporate disclosure statement pursuant to newly amended FRCP 7.1 and the Court's General Order 2023-06. Text entry order.(mr)
May 18, 2023 Judge Holly A Brady and Magistrate Judge Susan L Collins added. **NEW CASE** (ash)
May 18, 2023 Set Deadline per #2 Agreed Notice. Defendant Ultra Electronics Defense, Inc. answer due by 6/21/2023. (ash)
May 17, 2023 Filing 2 AGREED NOTICE to extend time to file answer filed by Ultra Electronics Defense, Inc. ; answer due by June 21, 2023. (Borowski, Craig)
May 17, 2023 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AINNDC-5245072.) from Whitley Superior Court, Cause No. 92D01-2304-CT-000332, filed by Ultra Electronics Defense, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Summons, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Borowski, Craig)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nesbitt v. Ultra Electronics Defense, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shaquana Nesbitt
Represented By: Christopher C Myers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ultra Electronics Defense, Inc.
Represented By: Craig M Borowski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Not classified by court: Pete Schroeder
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?