Burnett v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Haven Unique Burnett |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| General Counsel SSA (Court use only) |
| 1:2023cv00327 |
| July 31, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Joshua P Kolar |
| Theresa L Springmann |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Joshua P Kolar for a Report and Recommendation. The Court's review of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation will be governed by 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(C). The Court also REFERS any non-dispositive motions for disposition by the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A). Signed by Judge Theresa L Springmann on 9/26/2023. (rmf)
|
| Judge Theresa L Springmann added. Magistrate Judge Joshua P Kolar no longer assigned to case. (lns) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 7-3, the claimant/plaintiff is directed to file his/her opening brief by the deadline set out below. Failure to do so could result in dismissal of this case pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Briefs under this rule are subject to the page limitations in Local Rule 7-1(e). The Social Security Brief of the Plaintiff is due by 11/3/2023. The Social Security Response Brief of the Government is due by 12/15/2023. The Social Security Reply Brief of the Plaintiff is due by 12/29/2023. By Magistrate Judge Joshua P Kolar on 9/25/2023. Text entry order. (tc)
|
| Filing 8 MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONSENT FORMS IN A SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL CASE sent to all parties. Magistrate Consent forms due by 10/10/2023. (tc) |
| Filing 7 SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD by Commissioner of Social Security. (Seagle, Catherine) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Catherine A Seagle on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Seagle, Catherine) |
| Filing 5 Notice of Commencement of Social Security Appeal action, #1 Complaint sent to the Commissioner of Social Security. Commissioner of Social Security Answer or Motion due 10/2/2023. Pursuant to General Order #2022-20, the briefing schedule is as follows: The plaintiff's opening brief must be filed within 42 days after the answer is filed or 42 days after entry of an order disposing of the last remaining motion under Rule 4(c) of the Supplemental Rules, whichever is later. The Commissioner's response brief must be filed 42 days after service of the opening brief. Any reply brief must be filed 14 days after service of the response brief. (nal) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The court WAIVES payment of the filing fee and DIRECTS the clerk to docket a Notice of Commencement of Social Security Appeal Action. Signed by Chief Judge Holly A Brady on 8/2/23. (nal)
|
| **NEW CASE, MOTION PENDING** Magistrate Judge Joshua P Kolar added. (shk) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Adriana M de la Torre on behalf of Haven Unique Burnett (de la Torre, Adriana) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Haven Unique Burnett. (de la Torre, Adriana) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Seeking Judicial Review against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Haven Unique Burnett. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(de la Torre, Adriana) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
