Curie v. State of Indiana
| Chris-David Curie |
| State of Indiana |
| 1:2023cv00434 |
| October 11, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Holly A Brady |
| Susan L Collins |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Letter regarding previous filing from Chris-David Curie. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Copy of previous letter, #2 Exhibit Copy of previous order, #3 Envelope) (mrm) |
| Filing 8 CLERK'S ENTRY OF JUDGMENT. (Copy mailed to pro se party, certified mail, #) (jdb) |
Filing 7
ORDER: This case is DISMISSED. Signed by Chief Judge Holly A Brady on 12/05/2023. (Copy mailed to pro se party, certified mail, #)(jdb)
|
| Filing 6 Letter from Chris-David Curie returning court order. (Attachments: #1 Previous Court Order, #2 Envelope) (sej) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER FOR CHIEF JUDGE HOLLY A BRADY: Consistent with the request contained in Pla's #4 Letter Requesting Clarification, the deadline set in the Court's #2 Order dated 10/17/2023 is EXTENDED for two weeks. (cc: Chris-David Curie). (cer)
|
| Filing 4 Letter from Chris-David Curie requesting clarification. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (sej) |
| Filing 3 Letter regarding case from Chris-David Curie (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (sej) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER: The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to provide Plaintiff with a Form AO 239 Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis and the Court's Civil Complaint form. Plaintiff is ORDERED to pay the $402.00 filing fee in full or file a completed and signed Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis on or before 11/13/23. Plaintiff is ORDERED to file an amended complaint, bearing this cause number, on the Court's Civil Complaint form on or before 11/13/23. The amended complaint should follow the directions set out in the Civil Complaint form, should present a short and plain statement of Plaintiff's claim, and should not contain legal argument. Plaintiff is CAUTIONED that if he fails to comply with this Order, this case will be dismissed without further notice. Signed by Chief Judge Holly A Brady on 10/17/23. (Copy mailed as directed in Order). (nal)
|
| Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT against State of Indiana (Partial Filing fee $ 49.00, Receipt #FTW940), filed by Chris-David Curie. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Instructions, #2 Attachment 1 Part 1, #3 Attachment 1 Part 2, #4 Attachment 2 Part 1, #5 Attachment 2 Part 2, #6 Envelope) (File stamped copy and docket sheet mailed to pro se party) (sej). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Curie v. State of Indiana | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Chris-David Curie | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: State of Indiana | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
