Grant v. Social Security
Plaintiff: Natasha R. Grant and Natasha Grant
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Not Classified By Court: General Counsel SSA (Court use only)
Case Number: 1:2023cv00466
Filed: November 2, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Joshua P Kolar
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 6, 2023 Filing 6 Notice of Commencement of Social Security Appeal action ( #1 Complaint) sent to the Commissioner of Social Security. Commissioner of Social Security Answer or Motion due 1/5/2024. Pursuant to General Order #2022-20, the briefing schedule is as follows: The plaintiff's opening brief must be filed within 42 days after the answer is filed or 42 days after entry of an order disposing of the last remaining motion under Rule 4(c) of the Supplemental Rules, whichever is later. The Commissioner's response brief must be filed 42 days after service of the opening brief. Any reply brief must be filed 14 days after service of the response brief. (jdb)
November 6, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: The Court GRANTS the plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis #2 ; WAIVES payment of the filing fee; and DIRECTS the clerk to docket a Notice of Commencement of Social Security Appeal Action. Signed by Chief Judge Holly A Brady on 11/06/2023. (jdb)
November 3, 2023 ***NEW CASE** MOTION PENDING** Magistrate Judge Joshua P Kolar added. (nae)
November 2, 2023 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Nicholas T Lavella on behalf of Natasha R. Grant (Lavella, Nicholas)
November 2, 2023 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew F Richter on behalf of Natasha R. Grant (Richter, Matthew)
November 2, 2023 Filing 2 First MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Natasha R. Grant. (Richter, Matthew)
November 2, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Natasha R. Grant. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Richter, Matthew)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Grant v. Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Natasha R. Grant
Represented By: Matthew F Richter
Represented By: Nicholas T Lavella
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Natasha Grant
Represented By: Nicholas T Lavella
Represented By: Matthew F Richter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Not classified by court: General Counsel SSA (Court use only)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?