Streeter v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Isaiah A Streeter |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| General Counsel SSA (Court use only) |
| 1:2023cv00516 |
| December 13, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| John E Martin |
| Social Security: RSI Tax Suits |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF FULL CONSENT OF CASE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE: The parties having consented pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c), this case is fully consented to Magistrate Judge John E Martin. (sej) |
Filing 10
ORDER that pursuant to Local Rule 7-3, the claimant/plaintiff is directed to file his/her opening brief by the deadline set out below. Failure to do so could result in dismissal of this case pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Briefs under this rule are subject to the page limitations in Local Rule 7-1(e). The Social Security Brief of the Plaintiff is due by 3/8/2024. The Social Security Response Brief of the Government is due by 4/19/2024. The Social Security Reply Brief of the Plaintiff is due by 5/3/2024. Text order entry. By Magistrate Judge John E Martin on 1/26/2024. (smb)
|
| Filing 9 MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONSENT FORMS IN A SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL CASE sent to all parties. Magistrate Consent forms due by 2/9/2024. (smb) |
| Filing 8 SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD by Commissioner of Social Security. (Brechtelsbauer, Erin) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Erin L Brechtelsbauer on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Brechtelsbauer, Erin) |
| Filing 6 Notice of Commencement of Social Security Appeal action ( #1 Complaint) sent to the Commissioner of Social Security. Commissioner of Social Security Answer or Motion due 3/18/2024. Pursuant to General Order #2022-20, the briefing schedule is as follows: The plaintiff's opening brief must be filed within 42 days after the answer is filed or 42 days after entry of an order disposing of the last remaining motion under Rule 4(c) of the Supplemental Rules, whichever is later. The Commissioner's response brief must be filed 42 days after service of the opening brief. Any reply brief must be filed 14 days after service of the response brief. (sej) |
| Filing 5 Filing fee Received: $ 405.00, receipt number FTW1221 (sej) |
| ***Deficiency Deadline terminated per payment of filing fee in full (DE 5). (sej) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER: The Court DENIES with leave to refile the Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis #3 and ORDERS Plaintiff Streeter to either pay the filing fee in full or to file a corrected motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on or before 1/15/2024. The Court CAUTIONS Plaintiff that if he does not respond by the deadline, this case may be dismissed without further notice. Signed by Chief Judge Holly A Brady on 12/14/2023. (ash)
|
| Magistrate Judge John E Martin added. **NEW CASE, MOTION PENDING** (rmc) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Isaiah A Streeter. (Marvin, Cody) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Cody T Marvin on behalf of Isaiah A Streeter (Marvin, Cody) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Isaiah A Streeter. (Attachments: #1 AC decision, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Marvin, Cody) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
