Barry v. English et al
| Scott Thomas Barry |
| English, Christina Reagle and Justin H. Mayes |
| 1:2024cv00055 |
| February 8, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Holly A Brady |
| Susan L Collins |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 *Filed in case 3:24cv164* MOTION for Fast & Speedy Trial and MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Plaintiff Scott Thomas Barry. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(ash) Modified on 2/27/2024 (ash). |
Filing 3
ORDER: The clerk is DIRECTED to close this case and open a new case with these filings in the South Bend Division with the same judges under Northern District of Indiana Local Rule 40-1(a) and General Order 2023-29. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan L Collins on 2/20/2024. (New case #3:24-cv-164) (Copy mailed to pro se party)(mrm) Modified on 2/21/2024 to update new case (mrm).
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Scott Thomas Barry. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(ash) |
| Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT against English, Justin H. Mayes, Christina Reagle, filed by Scott Thomas Barry. (File stamped copy mailed to plaintiff) (Attachments: #1 Attachment, #2 Envelope)(ash) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
