Potts v. A&A Manufacturing Co Inc
Plaintiff: Donte D Potts
Defendant: A&A Manufacturing Co Inc
Case Number: 2:2007cv00167
Filed: May 24, 2007
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Office: Hammond Office
County: Porter
Presiding Judge: Paul R Cherry
Presiding Judge: James T Moody
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 29, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 59 OPINION AND ORDER on 47 Motion for Summary Judgment granting it as to the state law claims and denying it as to the federal law claims; denying 51 Rule 56 Motion to Strike. Signed by Judge Joseph S Van Bokkelen on 1/29/10. (mc)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Potts v. A&A Manufacturing Co Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Donte D Potts
Represented By: Anna Marie Hearn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: A&A Manufacturing Co Inc
Represented By: Jeffrey R Zehe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?