United States Steel Corporation v. Scheuerle Fahrzeugrabrik GmbH

Plaintiff: United States Steel Corporation
Defendant: Scheuerle Fahrzeugrabrik GmbH
Case Number: 2:2007cv00305
Filed: September 7, 2007
Court: Indiana Northern District Court
Office: Hammond Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Referring Judge: Andrew P Rodovich
Presiding Judge: Theresa L Springmann
Nature of Suit: Personal Property: Other
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
October 25, 2010 66 Opinion or Order of the Court OPINION AND ORDER denying 46 Motion to Compel Joinder. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew P Rodovich on 10/25/2010. (rmn)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States Steel Corporation v. Scheuerle Fahrzeugrabrik GmbH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States Steel Corporation
Represented By: Stephen A Tyler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Scheuerle Fahrzeugrabrik GmbH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.