Janky v. Batistatos et al
| Cheryl Janky |
| Speros Batistatos and Lake County Convention and Visitors Bureau |
| 2:2007cv00339 |
| September 28, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Hammond Office |
| Lake |
| Andrew P Rodovich |
| Philip P Simon |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
53
MEMORANDUM OPINION ORDER dismissing 43 Motion to Strike; dismissing 46 Motion for Attorney Fees and Costs Pursuant to Rule 11; dismissing as moot 48 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response. Attorney Gregory J. Reed is fined in the sum of $10,000; Attorney Stephanie L. Hammonds is fined in the sum of $5,000; Cheryl Janky is fined in the sum of $1,000; all fines are payable to the Clerk of the Court by 1 month from the date of this order. Attorneys Reed and Hammonds are prohibited from filing a complaint in a civil case on behalf of Cheryl Janky in this district without simultaneously posting a bond of $5,000 to cover the high probability of additional sanctions. Signed by Judge Philip P Simon on 7/31/09. (mc)
|
|
Filing
37
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING with prejudice 12 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff is ordered to show cause by 10/27/2008 why sanctions should not be imposed under Rule 11(b) for the actions enumerated above. Signed by Judge Philip P Simon on 9/25/08. (mc) Modified on 9/30/2008 to add word opinion (mc).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
