McLaughlin v. Freeman et al
Kevin McLaughlin |
Bernard Freeman, Roy Dominguez, Craig Ponton, John Zenone, G Ratajczak, Hailey, R Bergeron, Rodriguez, Osborne, B Perez and Melton |
2:2008cv00058 |
May 30, 2008 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
Lake |
Paul R Cherry |
James T Moody |
Plaintiff |
Federal Question |
42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 212 OPINION AND ORDER The Court GRANTS the Motion for Summary Judgment byDefendants Freeman and Dominguez DE 155 . Dfts Bernard Freeman and Roy Dominguez are terminated from the case. The Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part the Motion to Strike Evi dence Designated in Plaintiffs Response to Summary Judgment DE 165 , the Motion to Strike Evidence Designated in Both Plaintiffs Original Response and Amended Response to Summary Judgment DE 194 , and the Motion to Strike Plaintiffs Supplement to Amended Response to Summary Judgment and Plaintiffs Motion to Strike Plaintiffs Exhibit M andReplace with Exhibit M-1 DE 202 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul R Cherry on 9/26/13. (kjp) |
Filing 108 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 100 . Signed by Senior Judge James T Moody on 3/14/11. cc: pltf(kjp) |
Filing 64 OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 50 Dfts' MOTION for Summary Judgment. The Court AFFORDS the defendants until April 16, 2010, to advise the court whether they wish to waive the affirmative defense of exhaustion of remedies or whether they wish to pro ceed to a hearing at which the parties may present evidence on the question of whether the plaintiff filed a formal written grievance that would have complied with the jails grievance system but never received a response from jail officials. If the defendants wish to proceed to a hearing, they should also advise the court whether they wish to reopen discovery on the question of exhaustion. Signed by Senior Judge James T Moody on 3/16/10. cc: pltf (kjp) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.