Bamcor LLC v. Jupiter Aluminum Corporation
Plaintiff: Bamcor LLC
Defendant: Jupiter Aluminum Corporation
Counter Claimant: Jupiter Aluminum Corporation
Counter Defendant: Bamcor LLC
Case Number: 2:2008cv00194
Filed: July 1, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Office: Contract: Other Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Rudy Lozano
Presiding Judge: Andrew P Rodovich
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 7, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 155 OPINION AND ORDER: Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony of Robert Carbonara andJeffrey Bookwalter 115 is DENIED; the Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 117 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART; the Motion for Summary Judgment 120 is DENIED; the Motion to Exclude the Testimony of Steven Schmid, Ph.D. and Mark Hineman 121 is DENIED; the Motion to Strike Portions of the Affidavit of Derrick Titchenell 125 is DENIED; and the Motion to Strike Affidavit of James L. Balough and Bamcors Amendment to Interrogatory Responses 140 is GRANTED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew P Rodovich on 2/7/2011.(rmn)
November 29, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 149 OPINION AND ORDER denying 144 Motion for Leave to Take Trial Deposition. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew P Rodovich on 11/29/2010. (rmn)
September 13, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 138 OPINION AND ORDER denying 124 Motion to Stay Ruling on Jupiter Aluminum Corporations Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Solely as to Count III of the Complaint [DE 124] filed by Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant Bamcor, LLC on April 7, 2010. Bamcor shall respond to the pending motion within 14days of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew P Rodovich on 9/13/2010. (rmn)
September 23, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 98 OPINION AND ORDER granting Jupiter Aluminum Corps 53 Motion to Dismiss Count IV of Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew P Rodovich on 09/23/2009. (rmn)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bamcor LLC v. Jupiter Aluminum Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bamcor LLC
Represented By: Stewart D. Roll
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jupiter Aluminum Corporation
Represented By: Robert H. Nichols
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter claimant: Jupiter Aluminum Corporation
Represented By: Robert H. Nichols
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter defendant: Bamcor LLC
Represented By: Stewart D. Roll
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?