Chappey v. INEOS USA LLC et al
| Nancy Chappey |
| INEOS USA LLC and INEOS OLIGOMLY |
| 2:2008cv00271 |
| September 24, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| P.I.: Other Office |
| Lake |
| Paul R Cherry |
| Rudy Lozano |
| Plaintiff |
| Diversity |
| 28:1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
70
OPINION AND ORDER granting 52 Motion for Summary Judgment on behalf of defendant and against plaintiff and denying as moot 54 Motion to exclude certain opinions of Dr Munoz Price. The Clerk is FURTHER ORDERED to close this case. Signed by Judge Rudy Lozano on 8/17/2011. (rmn)
|
|
Filing
16
OPINION AND ORDER granting Defendant Ineos USA LLS's Motion to Dismiss certain claims pursuant to FedRCivP 12(b)(6). The Clerk is ORDERED TO DISMISSED plaintiff's claims arising under the theories of negligence per se, nuisance per se, pri vate nuisance, and public nuisance, and any claims Plaintiff purports to assert under a theory of product liability, IOSHA or other undisclosed labor laws WITH PREJUDICE. Additionally, the Clerk is ORDERED TO DISMISS all claims against Defendant "INEOS OLIGOMLY" WITH PREJUDICE. This case remains pending as to Plaintiff's negligence claim again Defendant, INEOS USA LLC. Signed by Judge Rudy Lozano on 03/23/2009. (rmn)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
