Avila v. United States Steel Corporation
Plaintiff: Susano Avila
Defendant: United States Steel Corporation
Case Number: 2:2008cv00356
Filed: December 10, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Office: Civil Rights: Jobs Office
County: Lake
Presiding Judge: William C Lee
Presiding Judge: Paul R Cherry
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:2000 Job Discrimination (National Origin)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 6, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 29 OPINION AND ORDER: Court GRANTS Dft 28 Motion for Summary Judgment. Summary judgment is ORDERED in favor of Dft United States Steel Corporation (EC Tin). Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul R Cherry on 7/6/2010. (jjj)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Avila v. United States Steel Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Susano Avila
Represented By: Jewell Harris, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States Steel Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?