Brown et al v. Temain et al
| Jason Brown and Alfreda Brown |
| Ionut M Temain, Sunny Express Inc, Jozsef Balla, CDN Logistics Inc, Expeditors International and John Doe |
| 2:2009cv00081 |
| March 27, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Motor Vehicle Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Andrew P Rodovich |
| Theresa L Springmann |
| Both |
| Diversity |
| 28:1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
95
OPINION AND ORDER granting plaintiff's 85 Motion for Default Judgment. The Clerk will enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff Jason Brown and against Defendants Ionut M. Temain, Sunny Express, Inc., and Jozsef Balla jointly and severally in thea mount of $4,869,400.54. The Clerk will enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff Alfreda Brown and against Defendants Ionut M. Temain, Sunny Express, Inc., and Jozsef Balla jointly and severally in the amount of $509,157. Defendant John Doe is dismissed. Signed by Judge Theresa L Springmann on 12/7/2012. (rmn)
|
|
Filing
64
OPINION AND ORDER granting 60 Motion for Entry of Judgment in favor of Defendant CDN Logistics, Inc and against plaintiff and directs the Clerk to enter judgment. Signed by Judge Theresa L Springmann on 01/20/2011. (rmn)
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER granting Defendant CDN Logistics, Inc's 41 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Theresa L Springmann on 12/22/2010. (rmn)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
