Erler v. Dominguez et al
Plaintiff: Mark Stephen Erler
Defendant: Rogelio Dominguez, Robert Malizzo and Danita Johnson Hughs
Case Number: 2:2009cv00088
Filed: April 2, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Office: Prisoner: Civil Rights Office
County: Lake
Presiding Judge: Paul R Cherry
Presiding Judge: Theresa L Springmann
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 28, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 51 OPINION AND ORDER: GRANTS plaintiff leave to file his Amended Complaint 33 ; GRANTS plaintiff leave to proceed as set forth in the attached order; pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1), DISMISSES all other claims and DISMISSES Defendants Edgewate r Systems, Inc., Medstaff, Inc., J. Malenshek, and the JohnDoe Defendants; ORDERS, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(g)(2), that Defendants Dominguez, Robbins, Barragan, T. Atkinson, Ratajczak, Wigsmoen, and Stack respond to the Amended Complaint as provided for in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; LIFTS the stay imposed on June 22, 2010; and AFFORDS the Defendants until March 31, 2011, with which to respond to the Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Theresa L Springmann on 2/28/2011. (rmn)
February 18, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 18 OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING the Plaintiff leave to proceed as set forth; DISMISSES all other claims and DISMISSES Defendants Robert Malizzo and Danita Johnson HUGHS pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1); ORDERS, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(g )(2), that Defendant Dominguez respond to the Complaint as provided for in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; DIRECTS the Marshals Service to effect service of process on Defendant Dominguez on the Plaintiffs behalf, and DIRECTS the Clerk of this Court to ensure that a copy of this Opinion and Order is served on him along with the summons and Complaint; and DENIES AS MOOT the Plaintiffs Motion [DE 17] filed on February 12, 2010. Terminating 17 Motion for court to screen complaint. Signed by Judge Theresa L Springmann on 02/18/2010. (cc: Erler) (rmn) Modified on 2/19/2010 to correct typo of defendants last name in the order (rmn). (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/19/2010: # 1 CORRECTED Opinion & Order) (rmn).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Erler v. Dominguez et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mark Stephen Erler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rogelio Dominguez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Robert Malizzo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Danita Johnson Hughs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?