Rodriguez v. Hammond Indiana City of et al
| Gloria Rodriguez |
| Hammond Indiana City of, Brian Miller, Michael Atherton, Dan Young and Other Unknown Hammond Indiana Police Officers and Supervisors |
| 2:2009cv00132 |
| May 6, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Hammond Office |
| Lake |
| Paul R Cherry |
| Theresa L Springmann |
| Plaintiff |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
50
OPINION AND ORDER granting 49 Hammond Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. This matter is dismissed pursuant to FedRCivP 41(b). Signed by Judge Theresa L Springmann on 12/28/2010. (rmn)
|
|
Filing
47
OPINION AND ORDER: Court GRANTS 44 Motion to Withdraw as Counsel. Appearances of Lorna Propes, David Nordwall, and Brian Monico on behalf of Plaintiff are WITHDRAWN. Court ORDERS Plaintiff Gloria Rodriguez has until 11/5/2010 for new counsel to en ter an appearance on Plaintiff's behalf, to request an extension of time to obtain counsel and advise the Court of her efforts to obtain counsel, or to demonstrate that she is sole beneficiary of the estate. In-Person Status Conference set for 11/18/2010 09:30 AM in US District Court - Hammond before Magistrate Judge Paul R Cherry. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul R Cherry on 10/6/2010. cc: Plaintiff, David Nordwall, Brian Monico (tc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
