Sears v. Newkirk
Plaintiff: Melody A Sears
Defendant: David Newkirk
Case Number: 2:2009cv00241
Filed: August 14, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Office: Hammond Office
County: Lake
Presiding Judge: James T Moody
Presiding Judge: Andrew P Rodovich
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 2, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER: Sears motion to strike 21 is DENIED; Sears motion to remand 13 is DENIED; and Newkirks motion to dismiss 10 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Count I of Searss complaint, alleging slander, remains pending; Count II, tortious interference, is dismissed. Signed by Senior Judge James T Moody on 9/2/2010. (rmn)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sears v. Newkirk
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Melody A Sears
Represented By: Arthur C Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David Newkirk
Represented By: Jonathan E Halm
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?