Freeman v. Porter County Indiana et al
| Scott Freeman |
| Porter County Indiana, Porter County Sheriff's Department, David Lain, John J Widup and Corporal Sandage |
| 2:2010cv00089 |
| February 22, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Hammond Office |
| Porter |
| Paul R Cherry |
| James T Moody |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
38
OPINION AND ORDER: Court GRANTS 34 Motion for Summary Judgment. Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants Porter County Sheriff's Department and Defendants David Lain, John J Widup, and Corp. Sandage in their individual capacities and against Plaintiff. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul R Cherry on 11/7/2011. cc: Scott Freeman (tc)
|
|
Filing
19
OPINION AND ORDER: Court DENIES 16 STIPULATION to Dismiss. Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART 8 MOTION to Dismiss [PARTIALLY]. Claims against Dfts David Lain and John J Widup in their official capacities, and Porter County Indiana ar e DISMISSED. Claims against David Lain and John Widup in their individual capacities, the Porter County Sheriffs Department, and Corporal Sandage REMAIN PENDING. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul R Cherry on 6/30/2010. (jjj) Modified to reflect all dismissed parties on 7/1/2010 (jjj).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
