DBS Construction Inc et al v. New Equipment Leasing Inc et al
| DBS Construction Inc and Wiliam Szarmach |
| New Equipment Leasing Inc, Robert Wolford, Miller Johnson Snell & Cummiskey PLC and John Doe |
| 2:2010cv00225 |
| June 3, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Hammond Office |
| Lake |
| Rudy Lozano |
| All Other Real Property |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
86
OPINION AND ORDER: Court GRANTS 73 New Equipment's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Signed by Chief Judge Philip P Simon on 3/28/2011. (tc)
|
|
Filing
62
OPINION AND ORDER denying 22 Motion to Admit Plaintiff's First Set of Requests for Admissions to Defendant. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew P Rodovich on 11/1/2010. (rmn)
|
|
Filing
61
OPINION AND ORDER denying 47 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to Answer to Amended Counterclaim 52 is GRANTED. New Equipment Leasing, Inc.s Request for Oral Argument 54 and Motion for Nunc Pro Tunc Relief Authorizing the Filing of its August 10, 2010 Amended Pleading 55 are DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Chief Judge Philip P Simon on 10/27/2010. (rmn)
|
|
Filing
43
OPINION AND ORDER: Szarmach's motion to return the equipment is GRANTED and the loader is ordered returned to Szarmach subject to the condition discussed. Signed by Chief Judge Philip P Simon on 9/10/2010. (tc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
