Cook v. Lain et al
| Thomas Cook |
| David Lain and Porter County Indiana |
| 2:2010cv00411 |
| October 14, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Hammond Office |
| Porter |
| Paul R Cherry |
| William C Lee |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
58
OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part without prejudice Defendants 40 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 46 Motion to Strike Report of Stephen B. Hanauer ; granting 52 Defendants Motion to Strike Certain Exhibits and Portions of Plaintiffs Response in Opposition to Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to enter judgment in favor of Defendant David Lain and against Plaintiff Thomas Cook as father and next of kin of Alan Cook on Plaintiffs federal § 1983 claims only. The Court REMANDS the remaining state law negligence claim to the Porter Superior Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul R Cherry on 3/7/13. (mc)
|
|
Filing
23
OPINION & ORDER granting 19 Defendant Porter County, Indianas Motion toDismiss Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint in Part. The Court hereby ORDERS that the First Amended Complaint against Defendant Porter County, Indiana is DISMISSED. The claims against David Lain, Sheriff of Porter County, REMAIN PENDING. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul R Cherry on 1/24/2011. (rmn)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
