JH v. Lake Central School Corporation
| JH |
| Lake Central School Corporation |
| 2:2011cv00228 |
| June 28, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Hammond Office |
| Lake |
| Paul R Cherry |
| Joseph S Van Bokkelen |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 20 U.S.C. ยง 1415 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
142
OPINION AND ORDER granting School Defendants 138 Motion for Reconsideration; court rescinds the portion of previous 137 Order that ordered remand to the hearing officer. Additionally, the Court denies Plaintiffs 141 Motion for Hearing on this issue. Consequently, the remaining issues before the Court are the Plaintiffs claim for attorneys fees as a prevailing party and § 1983 claim. Plaintiffs are permitted to submit a brief on the issue of summer 2011 reimbursement within thirty days of theissuance of this Order. Signed by Judge Joseph S Van Bokkelen on 2/11/15. (mc)
|
|
Filing
137
OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part each 114 , 120 motion for summary judgment. Court AFFIRMS the IHOs conclusion that the School violated the Familys rights under the IDEA, but VACATES his order that the School pay tuiti on and transportation costs for J.H. to attend a therapeutic day treatment school of his parents choice for two years, up to $50,000 per year. The Court REMANDS to the IHO to consider explicitly, in a manner consistent with this Order, wh ether the Family is entitled to reimbursement for J.H.s private placement. The requests for summary judgment on the § 1983 claims are DENIED. The 108 Motion to dismiss is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Claim I of the third amended complaint is DISMISSED insofar as it seeks monetary damages, and Claim II is DISMISSED as against Lake Central. In all other respects, the third amended complaint stands. Signed by Judge Joseph S Van Bokkelen on 9/30/14. (mc)
|
|
Filing
102
OPINION AND ORDER granting 85 Motion to Dismiss. J.H. has failed to state a plausible claim against Verracco and Machuca. Verracco and Machucas Motion to Dismiss 85 is GRANTED. J.H.s § 1983 claim is dismissed without prejudice. The IIED claim is dismissed with prejudice, as the Court finds that further amendment would be futile. J.H. may file a third amended complaint within thirty days. Signed by Judge Joseph S Van Bokkelen on 8/19/2013. (rmn)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: JH v. Lake Central School Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: JH | |
| Represented By: | Alexandra M Curlin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Lake Central School Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Monica J Conrad |
| Represented By: | Barbra A Stooksbury |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
