Iqbal v. Patel et al
| Mir S Iqbal |
| Tejaskumar M Patel, Warren Johnson and S-Mart Petroleum Inc |
| Warren Johnson and S-Mart Petroleum Inc |
| Mir S Iqbal |
| 2:2012cv00056 |
| February 3, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Hammond Office |
| Tippecanoe |
| James T Moody |
| Andrew P Rodovich |
| Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
87
OPINION AND ORDER The court finds that Salems notice of lien is invalid because final judgment has not been entered in this matter. Therefore, there is no judgment for the lien to attach. The court STRIKES the Notice of Attorney Fees Retainer Lien DE 73 and GRANTS the Motion to Strike Salems Lien DE 82 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew P Rodovich on 12/29/17. (kjp)
|
|
Filing
69
OPINION AND ORDER: Court DENIES defendants Warren Johnson and S-Mart Petroleum Inc.'s 64 Motion for Reconsideration and DENIES defendant Tejashkumar M. Patel's 65 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Senior Judge James T Moody on 8/18/2017. (tc)
|
|
Filing
62
OPINION AND ORDER: For the reasons set forth in the Opinion & Order, defendants Warren Johnson and S-Mart Petroleum Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment 23 , renewed by 53 , is DENIED and defendant Tejashkumar M. Patel's Motion for Summary Judgment 55 is DENIED. Signed by Senior Judge James T Moody on 7/10/2017. (jss)
|
|
Filing
39
OPINION AND ORDER re 23 MOTION for Summary Judgment: the parties are given until January 27, 2014 to respond to the courts analysis in this order. If neither party responds, the court will dismiss Iqbals claims for lack of subject matter jur isdiction. Defendants Johnson and S-Mart are also given until January 27, 2014 to file a brief explaining whether the court retains jurisdiction over their counterclaim if the court dismisses Iqbals claims. Signed by Senior Judge James T Moody on 12/27/13. (mc)
|
|
Filing
31
OPINION AND ORDER denying 27 Verified Motion Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 56(d). Iqbals response to the defendants motion for summary judgment shall be filed within 21 days of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew P Rodovich on 12/13/12. (mc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
