Newman v. Gagan LLC et al
Plaintiff: James Newman
Defendant: Gagan LLC, Think Tank Software Development Corp, DirectBuy Inc, United Consumers Club Incorporated, Laurie Gagan and James Gagan, Jr
Case Number: 2:2012cv00248
Filed: June 29, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Office: Hammond Office
County: Porter
Presiding Judge: Paul R Cherry
Presiding Judge: Joseph S Van Bokkelen
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 117
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 22, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 166 OPINION AND ORDER denying 85 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 87 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 92 Motion for Summary Judgment, with the exception that the Court concludes that Gagan, standing alone, met the ADA's definition of an "employer" during the relevant time period. Signed by Judge Joseph S Van Bokkelen on 9/22/16. (ksp)
September 7, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 165 OPINION AND ORDER: GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART 96 MOTION for Sanctions for Destruction of Evidence by Defendants. The Court OVERRULES Defendant's objections 159 . The Court ORDERS that the jurors may be instructed, as outlined in Orde r. The Court BARS Plaintiff, as outlined in Order. The Court declines to bar Plaintiff from presenting a defense regarding automatic downloading of records. The Court declines to award attorney's fees to Defendants. The Court declines to g rant Defendants a default judgment. The Court directs the clerk to remove the pending status of the following: Defendants' motion for sanctions 96 ; Findings, Report, and Recommendation 156 ; and Defendants' objection 159 . Signed by Judge Joseph S Van Bokkelen on 9/7/2016. (lhc)
March 31, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 147 OPINION AND ORDER The Court hereby GRANTS the Motion for Leave to File Under Seal Healthcare Records DE 136 and DENIES as moot the Motion for Leave to File Under Seal October 23, 2015 Documents DE 120 , Motion for Leave to File Under Seal November 9, 2015 Documents DE 121 , and Motion for Leave to File Under Seal November 20, 2015 Documents DE 122 . The Court ORDERS that the Sealed Document DE 137 be MAINTAINED UNDER SEAL. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul R Cherry on 3/31/16. (kjp)
August 13, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 81 OPINION AND ORDER denying without prejudice 80 Motion to Seal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul R Cherry on 8/13/2015. (kds)
March 28, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 38 OPINION AND ORDER: 18 , 20 Motions to Dismiss are DENIED as to Counts I, II and III, and GRANTED as to Counts IV and V. Accordingly, Counts IV and V of Newmans Complaint are DISMISSED. The Court allows him fourteen days to file and serve a proper motion for leave to amend the complaint, attaching his proposed amended complaint. UCC and DirectBuys motion to strike 28 is DENIED. Newmans motion to strike 30 is also DENIED. Signed by Judge Joseph S Van Bokkelen on 3/28/2013. (rmn)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Newman v. Gagan LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James Newman
Represented By: Jeffrey S Wrage
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gagan LLC
Represented By: Brian N Custy
Represented By: Christopher C Murray
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Think Tank Software Development Corp
Represented By: Brian N Custy
Represented By: Christopher C Murray
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DirectBuy Inc
Represented By: F Joseph Jaskowiak
Represented By: Lauren K Kroeger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United Consumers Club Incorporated
Represented By: F Joseph Jaskowiak
Represented By: Lauren K Kroeger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Laurie Gagan
Represented By: Brian N Custy
Represented By: Christopher C Murray
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: James Gagan, Jr
Represented By: Brian N Custy
Represented By: Christopher C Murray
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?