United States of American v. Malik Dr et al
| United States of America and Bradley A Stephens |
| Arshad Malik Dr, Afzal J Malika and Prime Health Care Services Inc |
| Robert J Dignam |
| 2:2012cv00306 |
| August 1, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Hammond Office |
| Lake |
| Paul R Cherry |
| William C Lee |
| Medicare Act |
| 31 U.S.C. ยง 3729 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
117
OPINION AND ORDER: GRANTS 107 MOTION for Attorney Fees and Expenses by Plaintiff Bradley A Stephens and Expenses and 115 Supplemental MOTION for Attorney Fees by Plaintiff Bradley A Stephens and awards the total sum $81,790.50. The Cle rk of the Court is instructed to enter judgment in favor of Relator/Plaintiff Bradley Stephens, and against Defendants Afzal Malik and Prime Health Care Services, Inc., jointly and severally, in the amount of $81,790.50, plus interest, at the prevailing legal rate, from April 29, 2016, until judgment is paid in full. Signed by Judge William C Lee on 11/18/2016. (lhc)
|
|
Filing
112
OPINION AND ORDER denying 109 Motion to Strike Attorney Fees and Expenses. Stephens' Reply to be filed by 7/26/2016. Defendants' Response to be filed by 7/19/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul R Cherry on 7/5/16. (ksp)
|
|
Filing
103
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 69 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; DENYING 95 Rule 12(f) Motion to Strike. Signed by Judge William C Lee on 3/23/16. (mlc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
